Automated Trading Strategy Review – Natural Gas Futures

Nat Gas Auto Trader

Natural Gas Futures have been pretty sideways over the past week but still having a bit of a a bearish overtone. We are now stuck in the middle and this chop is why the TREND Auto Trader hasn’t taken many trades this week. Even with difficult price action for the TREND Auto Trader, it still banked a solid $170 overall showing us that, even in difficult market conditions, it can still work VERY nicely bringing in solid profits regardless!

Come join us in the room and see how we do it!

Nat Gas Auto Trader

Natural Gas brought in a nice and steady $170 in profit this past week with some solid stats given the weeks difficult price action. We actually didn’t take any losing trades which will have an effect on the stats below so keep that in mind. We had our largest winning trade clock in at $170 and the largest losing trade back at $0. We also had our average winning and losing trades coming in at the same levels of $170 and $0 respectively. This gives us a reward vs. risk average of 170.0 and a profit factor of a gorgeous 99.00! These are the kinds of weeks we LOVE to see come back with no losing trades! We are seeing an average of 1.00 trades per day and holding them for a pretty typical amount of 180.0 minutes on average.

Nat Gas Executions

Natural Gas took a total of 1 trade this past week for a commission total with multiple contracts of $5 and since the one trade was a winner, a trade accuracy of 100%!

===========================================================

Want to see us trade LIVE? 
Click here to register for the
Free Trial!
Automated Trading Strategy; Let the
Computer do the trading
Are you a Crude Oil Trader? Click here to
trade Crude Oil
Are you a Euro Trader? Click here to
trade Euro
Are you an E-Mini Russell Trader? Click here to trade
E-Mini Russell
Are you a Gold Trader? Click here to trade
Gold
Join the Premier Live trade-room as an Advanced Member

    schooloftrade

    Click Here to Leave a Comment Below

    Leave a Reply: